WAS SANDOW EVEN A WORTHY MITB WINNER?

I admit I have not been watching wrestling like I usually would be. I use the picture in picture function on the TV and I read up on dirt sheets to stay connected. But I did catch the Damien Sandow cashing in the Money In The Bank on John "Hogan" Cena. Sandow lost and the IWC, Internet Wrestling Community, went into a riot of LA poportions. I mean it was like Cena was the cops that got off beating up Rodney King. I feel like I was the only one sitting back like, "What's the big deal?"

Did you watch the match? It was an instant DVD match in my opinion. The crowd was behind it. It's rare when you hear a "This is awesome" chant during a Monday Night Raw match. Yes Cena was "Super Cena" and no Sandow didn't win the championship like JBL predicted he would. My question for all the IWC is did Sandow deserve to win the MITB in the first place? I remember being at my cousin Travis house in KY watching the MITB PPV, which was overall bland by the way, and I was not happy with Damien Sandow winning the MITB for the WHC. Lets go back to see who was in that match. Of course you had Sandow, Cody Rhodes, Fandango, Swagger,  Antonio Cesaro, Wade Barrett, and Dean Ambrose. Sandow deserved out of all them? Oh shut up.

I think Sandow came out on a very good end even after this lost. Sandow had Cena beat all through the match, Sandow can easily build up from that. Now if Triple H is going to do what he's known to do according to his repuation, then Sandow is in trouble. But I seriously doubt this is the end for Sandow. His ring work is already there. His character needs some tweaking and that's about it. Now of course this is all my opinion.

Daniel Richerson
Twitter.com/big_dusty
Facebook.com/bigdusty